国内web3.0的网站介绍

什么是WEB3.0我就不说了，说了也不一定对，有兴趣的可以直接参考微软和google给出的概念。目前国内号称WEB3.0的网站还不多，估计是不大敢乱叫，2.0还没有折腾完，WEB3.0又出来？

What's WEB 3.0? I'm not saying it's not necessarily true, and interested people can refer directly to the concepts given by Microsoft and Google. We don't have a lot of web sites called WEB3.0.

我近期在网上转悠，对比了目前敢号称自己是WEB3.0的几个网站，做下简单的分析：

I've been on the Internet recently, comparing several sites that now dare to call themselves WEB 3.0 and doing a simple analysis:

1、大脉网（my160.com）

1. Pulse (my160.com)

这是一个电脑报下面的网站，是做基于电子商务业务的跨平台网站，用户可以在大脉网上查到同一个商品的不同卖家，而且这些卖家可以很跨淘宝，当当，拍拍等网站，用户很方便进行价格对比。这原本是一个不错的构想，但是从大脉网的发展来看，目前还是给别人是一个3流网站，商品内容少，根本达不到用户的购物需求。虽然是跨平台了，但是似乎跟WEB3.0还差很远。

This is a computer-based, cross-platform web site based on e-commerce, where users can find different sellers of the same commodity on the main arteries web, and where they can cross-twice, and when they do, shoot and wait, they can easily compare prices. This was a good idea, but in view of the development of the major arteries, it is still a three-way web site, with few commodity content, that does not meet the user’s demand for shopping.

2、龙讯：

2. Dragon Que:

没有出来就死掉了，估计李宋自己也莫名其妙，应该是从一开始到死掉都不知道自己做了什么WEB3.0，反正也没有什么好说的。

If you don't come out, you'll die. If you don't know what you did to WEB 3.0 from the beginning to the death, there's nothing to say.

3、阔地（codyy.com）：

Three, broad ground (cuddy.com):

这个网站是最近发现的，似乎还在开发中，不过初现WEB3.0的基本框架，好像是杭州一家公司开发的。做了下测试，归纳一下，主要体现了自由聚合功能，以及众多widget的应用。

The site was recently discovered and appears to be still under development, but the basic framework of WEB 3.0 is now being developed by a company in Hangzhou. Tests have been carried out, summed up, mainly as a function of free polymerization and numerous widget applications.

4、雅蛙（yawaa.com）

4. Yawaa.com

雅蛙也是类似与阔地的聚合平台，从形态上看，几乎没有大的区别，风格上模仿了netvibes，但是功能上相差很大。目前的应用情况还是不错的。

Yagfrogs are also similar to the condensed platforms in the open, which, in their form, make little difference, imitate the Netvibes in style, but have very different functions. The current application is still good.

5、排行榜网

5. Lists of high rankings

广东一家号称是基于WEB3.0技术与结构做的网站，我看了10分钟左右，什么也没有发现，怎么就跟WEB3.0挂上边了？

The Guangdong website is based on WEB 3.0 technology and structure. I've been looking for about 10 minutes. I don't see anything. Why is it hanging with WEB 3.0?

6、好客网

6. Happiness net.

这是一个网页游戏站，也打着首家WEB3.0模式的网页游戏。我很好奇，于是尝试注册，结果注册不成功，邀请码也没有发到我邮箱里，现在也不好评判里边到底是啥玩意。

It's a web game station, and it's a Web game in the first WEB 3.0 mode. I'm curious, so trying to register, it doesn't work, the invitation code doesn't come in my mailbox, and it's not easy to judge what's in it.

综合对比：除了阔地、雅蛙、大脉三家比较接近主流概念上的WEB3.0外，其他都是挂羊头卖狗肉。由于大脉只做购物，就先不谈了，现在对阔地和雅蛙进行分析。

A comprehensive comparison: apart from WEB 3.0, which is closer to the dominant concept of the open land, yuppies, and arteries, all are sheep-coating dogs. Since the big artery is just shopping, let's not talk about it, and now we're doing an analysis of the open ground and yuppies.

两者的共同点：1、都提供了个性化个人门户服务

Convergence: 1 - personalized personal portal services are provided

2、都以开放聚合为主要特点

2. All of the main features of open convergence

3、都提供了不少wedgit应用，但都还不成熟

Wedgit applications are available, but they're not yet mature.

不同点： 1、阔地在个性化主页的服务上明显强于雅蛙，拥有更多的功能，主要有窗口自定义大小，窗口随意拖曳，随意定位（好像有一定的技术含量）

Differing points: 1. Widely, the services of the personalized home page are clearly stronger than the Yagfrogs, with more functionality, mainly the custom size of windows, random drags of windows, and random positioning (like some technical content)

2、聚合功能上，两者持平，但是雅蛙目前可以通过添加QQ号等直接聚合，阔地还主要通过RSS的feed地址来聚合，估计阔地下一步要在这里努力了。

2. In terms of polymerization, the two are flat, but Yagfrog can now combine directly by adding the QQQ, etc., and in the broad area, mainly through the RSS feed address, and it is estimated that the broad area will work here for the next step.

3、特殊功能上，阔地富有创造性的开发了一个叫做“网页剪取”的功能，非常有意思，能够在任何网站上剪出自己想要的区域，保存到自己的页面上。同时阔地还提供了一个叫做COCO的网页IM，我用了下，发现用户体验还不是很好。不过IM功能似乎体现不出WEB3.0的概念。

In terms of special functions, a wide and creative development of a function called “page clipping” is very interesting and allows for cutting out the area that you want on any website and saving it on your own page. At the same time, there is a web page called COCO IM, and I use it to find that the user experience is not very good. But the IM function does not seem to reflect the WEB 3.0 concept.

共同的缺点：双方在一定的程度上，模仿了Netvibes，尤其是雅蛙，风格上都像，以为模仿国外的东西未必是好事。

Common disadvantage: Both parties mimic, to a certain extent, the Netvibes, especially the Yagfrogs, in their style, believing that it is not necessarily a good thing to imitate things abroad.

双方在widget的应用上，明显跟Netvibes有很大的差距，几乎没有真正跨平台的组建应用。

There is a clear gap between the application of widget and that of Netvibes, with few truly cross-platform applications.

随着Netvibes的进入，个性化主页的竞争会越来越激烈。而Netvibes却似乎没有标榜自己是WEB3.0，这是一个奇妙的现象。

As Netvibes enter, individualized homepage competition will become more intense. Netvibes, however, do not seem to label themselves WEB 3.0, which is an amazing phenomenon.